Originally Posted by
OOfff
you’ll never know, but you know it would have been better.
and the “alpa endorsement of current practice” is not, since it changed the coverage system and includes hard lockouts to identify proper payment in the moment. i get that you’re opposed to it, but why intentionally mischaracterize it?
How's that lockout workin for ya now? And yes, ALPA agreed to allow the current situation until the company decides. Nothing has changed. I know it could have been better, maybe by just adding a finite date with a 2x 23M7 payout penalty. Who knows how good it could have been, exactly!