Originally Posted by
OOfff
as i’ve said, i’m not arguing it was or was not.
i’m asking you to explain what was written into compliance. what, specifically, is compliant now that wasn’t compliant prior to the signing of this mou?
source: texas1970 "The MOU further codified previous settlement agreements that the company had been violating"
Not my words but do you agree with this statement or not?
My point was that if this is true we wrote them into compliance. That was argued as the necessity for this agreement.