Originally Posted by
OOfff
it further codified our and the company’s understanding of the rules.
you made the “written into compliance” claim repeatedly before that comment. so again, name anything that’s compliant now that was not compliant before.
ALPA by signing this agreement endorses the current situation until the company self certifies they have complied fully with the MOU. The question becomes, is the current situation compliant? Yes. Is it acceptable? Writing the company into compliance may have been an inflammatory choice of words be did they choose to endorse the 23M7 use the company is now exploiting? Yes, both now and later when/if QSs are implemented. So ALPA has agreed to continue to support the current policy and procedure as the norm. If that's not writing the company into compliance for their change in policy then I stand corrected. Are you satisfied with that explanation?
Now, what HAVE we achieved, not what might we achieve?