Originally Posted by
notEnuf
ALPA by signing this agreement endorses the current situation until the company self certifies they have complied fully with the MOU. The question becomes, is the current situation compliant? Yes. Is it acceptable? Writing the company into compliance may have been an inflammatory choice of words be did they choose to endorse the 23M7 use the company is now exploiting? Yes, both now and later when/if QSs are implemented. So ALPA has agreed to continue to support the current policy and procedure as the norm. If that's not writing the company into compliance for their change in policy then I stand corrected. Are you satisfied with that explanation?
Now, what HAVE we achieved, not what might we achieve?
so for the fifth time, what is compliant now that was not compliant a few months ago?
the answer that you’re avoiding admitting is “nothing.” you don’t have to continue mischaracterizing what this mou does in order to disagree with it.