Originally Posted by
rickair7777
Well it looks they are at least about to significantly reduce a base, with that as an excuse. That might of course not be the reason at all, but in fairness they have been communicating about the reliability issue for several years.
Also I do kind of get it from their perspective if there's a sharp contrast between bases, at least if one particular base is significantly worse than all the others. Although as Minrest said, they need to start thinking more like a big airline... some bases might have legit factors which make them different from others (ex. routine weather induced disruptions, or nobody wants to live there).
So the reason for SFO and LAX reduction is because of sick calls? I missed that part