Originally Posted by
SideStickMonkey
We did the democracy, it’s why we elect reps. It’s why we talk to our reps.
This is going to be an iterative process. The current status quo isn’t working. Let’s take a step forward and we can see the goods and others, how the company responds, and we fine tune it in Section 6. There’s the democracy you want.
I don't think they believed it would pass, which is likely why it wasn't sent to MEMRAT. If they do things like this in closed session, what is talking to your reps going to do? You can provide all the input you want, but sometimes you have to see the language to make a decision. Instead they "had to vote it in, so we could see what was in it..." I would have voted no simply based on the fact there is no timeline to QS implementation and no real punishment attached to it not being implemented by X date. I don't see the no lookback for sick is a real motivator for them, some disagree with me for sure. It also should have been leveled with GS, again, some disagree.