Originally Posted by
APTAP
I could be wrong- usually am- but it I think the author of the title of this thread and anyone else referring to “Eagle” just didn’t want to type out “wholly-owned” or Envoy/PSA/Piedmont. I don’t think they are out of touch (with who works for whom) at all. I think it was probably just easier/lazier to say “Eagle”.
We all know who “eagle” pilots work for.
We have more then wholly owned carriers flying our Regional lift. So another strike again the horrible generalization of "Eagle". Again, being out of touch.