Originally Posted by
Verdell
I'll take the bait.
In no single month did 23M7 cause more than $100m in "extra" pilot pay versus if 23M7 had not been used and trips were covered by following the coverage ladder (i.e. not using 23M7.)
I'll double down by prophesizing that you, or someone (he whom should not be named) will spin the result in a way that doesn't fit these parameters.
I'm not spinning anything. They know how much the recent shenanigans have cost them. It's a significant amount in totality (adding up the months of use it will be well over 100m cost). <---- That's what I've been saying. If that's not clear enough I blame your teachers for your reading comprehension deficiencies.