Well, doesn't having everyone down at a 48/60 hr Min BLG sound like shared sacrifice
.
Absolutely, if it's settled that the company can only build lines to 48/60 +13 vs. building them like they do now as long as they stay within 13CH. In that case all that would change for most fleets is a slightly lower RLG.
At airlines with pilot unity, working pilots have contributed to help out furloughed pilots with expenses, like health insurance COBRA payments.
Let's hope we are one of those carriers.
If it's you who goes, you have my sympathy, but that's about it.
Why do you so many of your posts revolve around what does and does not rise to the level of deserving your sympathy?
And if you think that's unfeeling, well come talk to me after 3 furloughs and 2 chapter 11s, and I might have a little more sympathy.
Again with the sympathy. Many of us have walked a similar road, but most of us don't want to see that happen again to anybody or use it as some badge of honor. Why would you want to have someone go through what you have in order to receive some understanding sympathy?
Btw, weren't the one a year or so ago that said retirements had no significant effect on movement/furlough padding and that only growth did? How's that working out?