Originally Posted by
dsevo
Yep. If people can’t be bothered to vote then it’s obviously not a compelling enough argument, in either direction. I think far less people are outraged by this than the internet would leave one to believe.
All that being said, the person in question does need to go IMO.
Should APA presidential elections be this way too? President for life. If membership cares enough, 50% + 1 will show up to elect someone new? Hmmm...