Thread: News thread
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2026 | 06:52 AM
  #991  
Stayontarget
Almost there
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 2,011
Likes: 144
Default

Originally Posted by AK26
Nope, the CC income is a continuous income source that is part of/deeply integrated into their airline operations. SLBs are a non-operating revenue source that will go away once the order is fulfilled...SLBs are not a strategy for an airline, and cannot be capitalized -- they are valued separately as a limited-time cash flow stream.

Just for context on the SLBs, the revenue that is booked is the gain on sale, not the price of the sale: lets say they purchased each plane at an average price of $35M at the market lows during COVID, and the market value for each now averages $50M...they can book $15M in revenue. However, lease rates are tied to current market values, so Frontier's leasing costs go up...lessors are financials businesses and they are generally not buying planes (even in a competitive SLB market) if they don't see a good return on them.

The proper way to account for SLB revenue is to separate them from the airline operations business, and to value them as a one-time stream of cash flows. At a high level, with rough numbers and assumptions, let's say you believe the average airline should be worth 6x their profits (lets use EBITDAR in this case), and that Frontier is no different than the average airline in terms of what it should be worth as a business. If Frontier's EBITDAR in a normalized scenario is $700M, then the company should be worth $4.2B. Let's say you spread the cash flows from the SLBs and come up with a value of about $1B for the SLBs...now you have the company as worth $5.2B. To get to the equity value you subtract the debt (including leases), let's say approximately $5B...you get just $200M left for the equity. Instead, if you don't separate out the SLBs and treat them as normal earnings...you would be adding ~$300M to revenue with little to no costs, which you would then be capitalizing at 6x, as if it is recurring the same way your normal airline profits are. That would leave you with $1B in EBITDAR, giving you a $6B value and $1B for the equity...

To put it in another way, imagine you own a small manufacturing business that generates $100k in profits every year. 10 years ago you purchased a factory for $1M, and now that factory is on prime real estate for data centers, and you get an offer to sell that factory for $11M. You sell and book the gain-on-sale profit of $10M (ignoring depreciation). Do you think that your business should be valued like a business generating $100k in profits per year or $10.1M in profits per year?

Yes the Q2 & Q3 results were highly concerning. Q4 is in the right direction but looks to be an operational loss still without the SLB. Unsustainable. A business model the depends on high utilization without being high utilization has a major problem. This is also with pilots being paid substantially less so even more concerning.

I believe the enterprise value lies
more in the fleet itself. New planes and engines are still a premium. We have an average age under 5yrs and, so far, a very large order book over the next 5 years. If you need to ramp us size quickly we are a way to do that.

I did find it interesting that spirit had some of their 320 CEOs for sale for a while and couldn’t move them. Yes they were still being financed but I found that surprising nonetheless. I’m not sure if JetBlues goldie oldies are as valuable as we presume anymore.
Reply