Originally Posted by
tennisguru
That’s the true data we need. We shouldn’t be comparing this winter to our previous winters. We need to compare our sick increase vs the sick increase at the other legacy carriers. If we spiked say 50% but UA and AA spike the same (or even more) then there is really no case to say that the increase was due to the suspension on look back. If, however, UA and AA spiked 50% but we spiked 100% then it would more stand to reason that at least some of our increase was due to look back suspension vs the bad flu season.
Agreed. Although I’m perfectly fine with management continuing to neglect that analysis and blaming the spike on lookback suspension, if it gets us QS faster.