Originally Posted by Hotel Kilo

They could have easily contracted and licensed those 3rd parties. Cloudfare shut us down for almost 2 weeks. They were given full access to our systems via as a third party vendor (thru Microsoft).

What about Oak Notes?

Yeah, I do have a problem with him not being an employee getting the lists - and making money off it. If he offered it for free, then I wouldn't be squawking about it. Also, I stated he is welcome to show us the balance sheet. If he's not profiting off of it and the balance sheet is a push, I'll shut my mouth. I maintain he is profiting from it (until I see otherwise). Don't think he's doing it out of the goodness of his heart.

Also, my larger beef is the inconsistent application of our information/technology assurance and security policies. Wanna test it out? Email a friend a copy of any company specific info (that's how its defined in the policy not my words). See what happens. Guarantee they won't take it lightly.

Yet somehow influencers can splash delta branded info all over their postings, but a UNA guy can't make a bag tag that has an image of the widget on it? And yeah the influencers are getting paid via clicks, likes and subscribes depending on the platform they are using. A non-employee gets access (don't care how really) to company specific information (pretty sure our SL fits that defnition), yet they look the other way.

Very inconsistent. That's my issue here.

You think it's fine for him, I don't. We disagree on that.