Originally Posted by
PackFan1
My point is that paying RJ crews at legacy CBA rates with high NECs and disability packages probably isn’t financially sustainable. That’s just reality.
Is it? Are you familiar with DC-9 and how many seats were in each variant and who operated them? The numbers aren't that dissimilar from RJ's of today. Along the same lines, ERJ-170/ERJ-190 type rating covers the 170 through 195. Up to the company which variant/seat configuration/metal they want on certain markets... Kinda like how we do it here with -700's now with 137 seats vs. MAX 8 or -800 with 175 seats for the same rate. On a side note, we also used to fly the -500 here (my favorite Classic by far) and it only had 122 seats, and it paid the same as the -800.
Lastly, I'd pay attention to what guys like Zap have to say... Eeyore (Zap) has been around the block and probably has more airline uniforms than most normal people have underwear.