View Single Post
Old 04-12-2026 | 06:52 AM
  #26  
rickair7777's Avatar
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,098
Likes: 788
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Freds Ex
Is 50% really needed? or just a controlling interest? Companies are often controlled by one rather large shareholder even if that shareholder doesn't own 50%.
Yes, you could do M&A if there is a very small number of other large shareholders who are very firmly in your camp and can be relied on to vote accordingly. Typically institutional investors like pension funds, or private equity, but could in theory be a rich-guy individual shareholder.

But if you're buying shares on the open market to acquire a large minority position, you will still have to a pay a premium so it would be risky business to rely on other votes, unless you're very certain.

Elliot did not do M&A with SWA, but they did a big management shakeup from a minority position, by recruiting other shareholders (not too hard, they were already annoyed at management).

I think generally when acquiring another airline for purposes of integrating into your operation (that's the norm due to scope) you would absolutely want a controlling interest so that you have complete freedom of action to make any and all changes. Don't want to risk other investor groups possibly vetoing certain parts of your integration plan.

Also the controlling interest threshold in some cases can be higher than 50% for purposes of approving major muscle movements. Depends on state law and also the way the company is structured... just because you *own* 51% doesn't always give you the right to dictate to the other 49%.
Reply