Originally Posted by
JustInFacts
I read that document from CT. Did you notice that a lot of his red (bad) areas were either unsubstantiated opinion or were also stated as green because they were better than current book. Take the change in layover disruption. He listed it as a red item because that is not what he thought the polling said, taking up several lines to make it look bad, but then put a few words in green stating better than book. So, a big blob of red, but quietly acknowledged that it is an improvement.
Yes, I did notice. there was a lot of: well, this area falls short of polling, therefore, we are painting it red.
I appreciate their fighting spirit, but in my opinion this fight is over. we go at it again, and we lose. and while this TA may not be a knockout victory, it is perhaps a draw.
and I would like to apologize to you specifically for some of the things that I said to you via my alter ego.
ok. enough kumbaya, or however you spell it.
peace.