View Single Post
Old 04-19-2026 | 08:40 AM
  #118  
sl0wr0ll3r
Now Old
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 59
From: Bent
Default

Originally Posted by FriendlyPilot
The law is called the "Railway Labor Act" which was amended specifically for airline mergers in 2008 under a law called McCaskill-Bond.

Here is direct language from the Law:

(4) the term “covered transaction” means—
(A) a transaction for the combination of multiple air carriers into a single air carrier; and which
(B) involves the transfer of ownership or control of—
(i) 50 percent or more of the equity securities (as defined in section 101 of title 11, United States Code) of an air carrier; or
(ii) 50 percent or more (by value) of the assets of the air carrier.


Here is the specific section on the Congress website.

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?...edition=prelim

It’s clear there is no requirement for United to bring over pilots on asset purchases if they don't break the 50% threshold. It’s not "covered" under this law, which is the only law that mentions requiring integration of other airline employee groups.
Tell me this…several seniority integrations took place before the existence of the McCaskill-Bond amendment. Also, pilots (ex. - Pam Am) were transferred with routes and aircraft. Why did any of this happen absent McCaskill-Bond? Because that amendment isn’t the end all with respect to required integrations.

Contractual provisions are applicable and enforceable, as is ALPA’s Merger and Fragmentation Policy. You may have read a book or took a class at some point. But I’ll side with Cohen, Weiss & Simon and ALPA’s Representation Department attorneys over your repetitive soapbox pronouncements.
Reply