Originally Posted by
GutterGuard
If OOBWS goes away, then I'm most likely voting "No."
BWYW WWYB. I'm tired of seeing O instead of G#1 in trip coverage. 23M7 is on the way out, either via hiring or changes to trip coverage. Let's send OOBWS with it.
Originally Posted by
bluejuice71
I believe the negotiators and our union are intimately more familiar with what our leverage and the company’s desperation is. They have literally been dedicating their lives to this for months and also have all the polling data. So I’ll trust what they come up with more than some rando’s on the internet.
The leverage decreases every month. The company can hire their way out of 23M7 eventually. I'm not convinced a long drawn out path maximizes our leverage. I do think it lessens the likelihood RG keeps his job, which is a reason to drag our feet.