Originally Posted by
hummingbear
Doesn’t filter out the bad & doesn’t find the best but it’s a good system? Does filtering out the people who “don’t GAS” mean “identifying the people who won’t pay $1K-$2K to increase their odds”? Pretty screwed up way to determine who your people are if you ask me.
And I 100% agree with what you’re saying about identifying personalities, but you’re gonna find out a lot more about someone by asking them about their last vacation, the car they’re rebuilding, the soccer team they coach, or their goal to visit every MLB stadium- whatever- than asking them to parrot back a handful of pre-rehearsed TMAAT monologues that may or may not be complete BS.
If you shot the sh— with me for 5 minutes in the cockpit you’d learn more about me than you would in 3 hours of me reciting TMAAT responses that I paid someone $1K to teach me how you like to hear them. It’s a weak way to learn about someone there’s just no incentive structure to change it.
Yeah, see now THAT I subscribe to. I don’t think having an HR interview is the problem. I definitely think that a TMAAT format may not be the best way to do it. We can do a lot better job at learning about people with questions structured in a much better way.