Originally Posted by
Setspeed
As someone who leans ALPA in this whole process, doesn’t repealing the gustin amendment move the goal posts a bit? We couldn’t seem to organize a card drive to get 50% +1 to force a vote so instead we are looking for something less than a majority of eligible voters to get a future merger to pass.
I’m all for this merger process but also interested in what’s fair and equitable to the whole pilot group.
I’d figure there’s 1/4 of the pilot group that doesn’t care who represents us. Is that their problem? I guess it makes it so. Or is the argument that these people should be informed and involved and must vote one way or the other?
As far as I care, if somebody can't be bothered to vote then their opinion shouldn't count any way.
If APA didn't want their existence in danger maybe they shouldn't have ignored the majority of the pilot group during the last contract negotiation in favor of a few loud voices from The Line. Actions have consequences. sorry not sorry