Originally Posted by
DuaneWoerth
Is anyone watching closely?
EVery one of the pro ALPA reps on the BOD voted against this motion. They voted to preserve a chance for to themselves to be an EVP at ALPA.... what does that tell you? What are they being promised?
MOTION: It was moved to direct the AAMNC to negotiate an amendment to the ALPA
governing documents to prohibit any AA pilot from serving as an ALPA EVP, for 15 years, who
has previously served as a Management Pilot, National Officer, member of the Board of
Directors, National Committee Chair, or member of the AAMEC and AAMNC, from the period
of November 2022 to present .. The motion was defeated 8-11-1-0.
MAKER: Gustin SECOND: Knox
FOR: Cutler, Knox, Gustin, Dick, Lokey, Scanlan, WSmith, Meyers
AGAINST: Boulanger, Ham, Lawler, BSmith, Brynjolfsson, Wilhelm, Funderburk, Henshall,
Sweep, Vasin, Mcllvenna
ABSTAIN: Wachter
ABSENT: -0-
And of course, only AFTER the merger committee told the Board that ALPA was done negotiating, they vote to move the goal posts to merge. Shady stuff
I don’t really understand what you’re typing.
Alpa declined to accommodate APA request of banning which members could serve their own national office?
APA options are walk away from merger because demands weren’t met, or drop demand request?
Dropping request is shady?
Maintaining the demands in order to kill a merger not shady?
I have no idea who is shady but this explanation is insufficient to determine who is.