Originally Posted by MalteseX

I think the issue is that the company called the 727 S/O seat in excess on the first excess bid, which closed merely a week ago----then all of a sudden, it's not in excess and more people go into the seat than the number that occupied it before the first iteration. THAT seems like favoritism---and finding loopholes or creating them to get a "political" result. THIS action is what I believe is the controversial part in talking with buds in the company.