Originally Posted by
FDXLAG
If we are going to change the LOA again lets get the invol STV eligibility window changed back from 1 every 6 bid periods (LOA) to 1 in 14 (contract). This will fix one of the most blantant stick it to the junior guy provisions (at least in the LOA).
Excellent post.
Clearly, how often someone can be involuntarily STV'd is a "cost nuetral" issue for the company ---- 1 every 6 vs 1 every 14 is just a "senior" vs "junior" issue regarding "how protected" the top guys are from invol STV'd.
Please don't use the "don't worry, it will go senior argument" ---- cause if that's true, then you still won't mind changing it.
OK --- senior guys ---- here's a GREAT issue where you can show your willingness to "share the pain"....any takers?
This one's not about $$$...
...and you'd still get the best lines over in HKG if you got non-vol'd due to your seniority.
Perhaps, if I saw this type of change incorporated into the FDA LOA Amendment than I would believe we actually "negogiated" some significant improvements and would see a tangible example of how senior guys are stepping up to help out in trouble times.