Originally Posted by
MalteseX
I remember your previous post and that was encouraging. That was good news---that the union was preparing to support/fight for those guys excessed. Your previous post came a couple of weeks later than my original question to the union--I posed it twice on the first excess bid (ie the one that excessed guys OUT of the 727 SO seat)---and the union never responded; to me or a couple of other guys affected on THAT bid. I guess they were hit with many queries and didn't get around to all of them etc..... that's understandable.
But, later from your previous post, it was encouraging to know that the union was backing the words in the contract. But a few of us learned it here on APC..... however, some of the guys that don't read these boards were pretty miffed at what they considered being shunned by the union.
But it was encouraging to read your previous posts and get info from a couple of other guys that said the union had responded to them as well.
I had the exact same experience w/CE as AFW did concerning the same issue. The 64k question was how, not when the Co. would balk at giving the Re-loc. packages.