Originally Posted by
ERJ135
This has come up before, but it's worth repeating.
1. The court has no standing, thus the judge will almost assuredly have to dismiss it on summary judgement - probably before the trial starts.
2. The pax can show no damages. You cannot win a suit against some entity with a claim of what might happen in the future. They're claiming damages for the after-effects of a merger that they're suing to prevent.
3. Dept of Justice has sole authority in airline mergers. A court ruling claiming to hold an order over DOJ would be appealed by DOJ as a violation of law - and they would be right.
Just another example of being able to sue anyone for anything...but you can't win this one.
Carl