voided, delayed - either way, the only option to potentially get this thing out was to vote out ALPA - you play the cards you're given. My point is not about the technicalities of the decision, it is about the relative petty topic covered by the video vs. what was at stake. As far as being aimed at West, I thought their vote was pretty much in hand.

And it has been hinted at, but not overtly said. Saying something three times is NOT, NOT, NOT the same as saying something and then backing it with substance or facts. That video was even shallower than most of the political ads showing on TV. I am in no way against ALPA demonstrating the benefits of their representation - nothing wrong with education - but, if that was the best they could do.......