Originally Posted by
Tinpusher007
You ARE quoting the fuel load, not the thrust and you are wrong. You are talking about the airplane that I fly. I just quoted you the correct number from my manual. And I was NOT the original person who stated that the 900 was 30% more efficient than the 175. I was just asking you how you thought it made sense for it to be even 15% more efficient while weighing less than the 175 and having 10,0000lbs more thrust (as you claim) which would be a drastic increase in fuel flow and therefore NOT effiicient at all. Check your facts...ALL of them.
How long have you been with Mesaba? I thought so. CRJ9 is also my aircraft. Maybe I am wrong maybe I am not. At this point who gives a ****. You and Jockstrap are both like obnoxious chihuahuas that won't let go of my shoelace. Only solution is to kick it a swift kick in the ###.
Not even sure why Jockstrap spend so much time in this thread. Aren't you the guy that drank too much company koolaid and always boasts about how great Skywest is? Why don't you go to the Skywest thread and stop pestering others here.
Like I said several times go back to the original thread. With you two pestering around here, no ones been able to say anything of any value.