Thread: 401k
View Single Post
Old 08-15-2008 | 01:21 PM
  #28  
Nevets
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaPaySoon
I don't disagree with your statement on most situations (but I would definately NOT call that action courageous. I would say narcissistic), but not on topics that have an effect on every member such as this. No MEC should stand above a membership vote at the local level on something that every member will feel.
I disagree. These types of votes is precisely why you vote for representatives. It not different that your representative in the House of Representatives, Senate, State Legislators, Board of Supervisors, City Councils, etc. They are there to vote on issues that effect all their constituents every time they cast a vote. This is why its extremely important to do your civic duty to make yourself informed, tell your representative how you feel, and vote for people that feel the most like you do on the important issues to you. But when it comes down to it, the representatives should always vote what they feel is best regardless of how their constituents feel. And if the constituents don't like the way their representative voted then they can recall them or vote someone else when their re-election comes around. This is why I said it was politically courageous. It is not narcissistic. In fact, many of the people who voted for this were going to be negatively affected by it anyways.
Reply