Originally Posted by
jdt30
What's pathetic is that if this would have passed the company said there would be no need to furlough. Explain that to me. How does voting in a LOA change whether or not CAL needs to furlough. What a bunch of b.s. IMHO, the company is just using those unfortunate pilots as hostages, or leverage to get us to bend to their pressure.
Exactly, pretty transparent! And now the ball is back in the company's court. I'm curious as to whether the company is violating labor laws by initiating this furlough under false pretense.