View Single Post
Old 10-20-2008 | 01:14 PM
  #29  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
ToiletDuck
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by wi_pilot
Do you ever get tired of adamantly defending RAH any time their name is mentioned on this board? Your views are well known and apparently not shared by many others, and you're about to derail another thread.
I'm not defending RAH for anything. I'm not for this so don't go putting words in my mouth. If my views were well known you'd know that I don't like it. I just haven't seen mking have any relevance to any post of his yet. Those questions I asked I don't know the answers to. If he does then I'd like to know. If he doesn't then he's just full of it. What's wrong with wanting accuracy and not some personal smear campaign? So far seems like most "ranters" are mad because the RAH management accepted flying. Both unions and pilot groups have been requesting information regarding the Midex/RAH deal and both still don't know the answers to any of the questions above. Since we don't know how this deal came to be, who went to who, who proposed what, etc. then statements like the one above are just rants based on nothing. I couldn't oppose this transaction more and none of the people whining here know any of the details about it. I'm not adamantly defending RAH anymore than you AWAC in many of your posts. Lighten up.
Reply