Originally Posted by
TonyWilliams
I don't know if the FAA has gotten involved, but in the world of irony, the CP who fired DD (TF) will possibly have his ATP revoked for not logging his professional helicopter flying and not being able to prove that he didn't exceed any duty limitations flying the CRJ.
Doesn't the burden of proof usually lie with the protester? Not to defend TF at all, but how is the burden of proof on him that he didn't and not the FAA to prove he did exceed flight time limits? Even if he does lose his ATP, he won't lose his job; they'll keep him in an office until he retires.