Originally Posted by
Busboy
I understand the 1st 5 years anomoly.
I was questioning the part, after that. However, I didn't notice the original chart was 3 years old. And, didn't account for those hired in the last 3 years.
I still like my theory of NDs, that choose to continue working, age in "donkey" years.

Uh, I think you misspelled @$$!