That's not true satchip. I've posted the exact language of the NWA proposed fence, and there is no leap frogging. None.

The leap frogging you cite was the concept of dynamic seniority as it relates to actual attrition. That concept was if the list was constructed via a RATIO. There is no such dynamic seniority concept as part of the NWA proposal which is Date of Hire and a 10 year fence.

You are correct about the fences expiring too close to when DAL retirements begin to kick in. I think the fences should extend to the end of DAL's big retirement push to be fair.

All just a moot point now though, but I wanted you and everyone else to be clear on what the NWA proposal is and what it isn't.

Carl