Originally Posted by shackone
Letters such as this always make me wonder what sort of applicant stats this guy was able to come up with when he got hired.
He'll have to tell me when 'diversity' became 'qualified'...I thought UAL was the benchmark for this fallacy.
Just wondering when "diversity became unqualified"? Diversity accounts for less than 10% of all "major" new-hires. If you didn't make it, take a close inventory of guess who? "YOU!" You are possibly better than the 90% WASP males who were hired, but you'll never know with that pathetic excuse. Are things in America that bad for white folks? I thought it was bad for all of us working people. Lame....Lame....Lame.