Originally Posted by
flyboyjake
holy ####, I think I nodded off a few times with that one. To start, I am still flying the lear, so no Rich its not what im trying to do. Its just a really good loophole I think, and what better place to bring it up. Maybe ill shoot a letter off the the chief counsils office, but dont expect an update for a year. As for your buddys info...Some pretty typical language from the FAR, but none of it really addresses the issue. much of it had to do with acting pic, which is irrelevant. And where does the falsification of records, proficiency check, etc... come in to play? I know some of you long time captains are offended at even the notion that an FO could log PIC with an sic type...and frankly, it doesnt sound too rational to me, but ego aside, with respect to LOGGING pic only, where in that jumble of regs do you see that it prohibits it?
Whats that saying--something about being the messenger.......As I stated, this is coming from a Fed.
About falsification: It was a blanket statement meant to anyone--seeing a this is a public forum-- (not pointing a finger at you Jake) who is logging time that is incorrect......
And Jake, I could care less what or how you are logging time. Dont ever think Im "offended" at what you log. What I am "offended" is what you accused me of when you sent that text. It was wrong, and your accusation was wrong, and it crossed the line. Your logbook does not affect me in any way, shape or form, so I simply dont care how or what you do with it. You asked the question, I asked a friend who is a Fed, and posted his answers. IF you dont like it or disagree, send me an email and I will forward it to him. Then you can hash this subject out with him.
And Noy, my statement about no short FAR's, c'mon now. Its called SARCASIM!