No, like a professional lawyer. How about reading just the part of the contract dealing with Reserves. "Requests to move or drop days will not be unreasonably denied" - how is that even remotely enforceable? How about the verbage that allows them to drop the BLG to 48 while keeping the number of reserve days at 15, reducing an R-day value to 48/15?

Pilots will talk about silly things such as "intent of the language during negotiations" and "that is not how they meant it" while lawyers will say stuff like "but the judge/arbitrator will interpret it as it is written" and "why did they write it that way".