View Single Post
Old 01-16-2009 | 10:35 PM
  #8  
Hawaii50's Avatar
Hawaii50
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 9
From: 3fidy
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
It seems as though it should AND no negotiating capital needs to be expended.

When I look at their "award," all I can think of is all of the training that will be needed in the other direction when they get their 777's and that the people who can get back to their original equipment requiring the least amount of training probably won't even have recall rights, because if they did what would be the point of recalling them within 180 days or even displacing them in the first place? I won't even get into the whole notion of voluntary displacing off of an aircraft to bump someone else off of another aircraft so they can bump someone else....

What a waste. The bottom line is that their system is just plain dumb.

New K Now

It really is.
If there is a voluntary displacement awarded it means someone was getting displaced off that equipment either way. It's just a mechanism to allow someone who may be happy going to another piece of equipment to get it w/paid move so another can stay. I have to agree though. I've been here along time and this bid was ridiculous with all the training generated. Last time I saw anything like it was post 911.
Reply