Thread: US Airways scope violation Grievance
View Single Post
Old 02-07-2009 | 05:14 PM
  #32  
trent890's Avatar
trent890
Don't need that HUD!
10M Airline Miles
15 Years
On Reserve
40 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 321
Likes: 2
From: B787 FO
Default
Originally Posted by STILL GROUNDED
Well it doesn't say they are operating to many "Larger than Large" jets so I am guessing RAH will send the 170's to Portland and replace them with 190's in Philly.
Of course it doesn't say anything about operating too many "Larger than Large SJ's" because there is no such term used by US Airways. In my opinion, Hetman made that up, unless he proves me wrong.

RAH recently secured their contract in exchange for giving Airways some $$$ during debt refinancing, so I don't see why RAH would move 170's to Portland. All 25 of the US Airways mainline E190 confirmed deliveries have been made, so "replacing" a mainline E190 onto a flight that used to be flown by an Express Large SJ means that the former E190 flight will then have to be covered by other mainline equipment.
Last edited by trent890; 02-07-2009 at 05:36 PM.
Reply
0