Originally Posted by
johnso29
But we have a HUGE battle approaching because management says there is not a viable replacement for the DC9, and appears as if they are in NO hurry to find one. This will start soon, as its likely the new DAL will not invest into the DC9s to keep them flying.
Do we have proof of this other than anecdotal comments made that are residual misunderstanding about the cycle limit on the DC9 from the SLI hearings where DALPA was trying everything they could to diminish the role of the DC and those who flew them?
We are getting mixed signals on the future of the DC9 (other than of course it will be eventfully replaced). The cycle out by 2012 issue is a red herring, where the real factor is Navaid compliance and the 88's have the identical issue. So even if they don't invest most are still good to 2012 assuming the navaid requirements are not slid
OK, so MD90 and possibly 717 may be used as a MD88, but not DC9 replacement? If this is the case it will still be post SOC so will effect everyone as pilots would displace off of the DC9 into what their seniority can hold. All the 717/MD90 available will not replace even the current 88 fleet.
The DC9 is ~1400 pilot jobs at DAL staffing formulas - as much as dislike this 76 seat deal, I find it hard to believe those jobs, together with another ~3000 MD jobs are for sale to 76 seat encroachment.
Conspiracies are fun, but show me some proof of this other than this 76 seat grievance settlement.