I got to love the discussion with ALPA reps in JFK... I guess to some pilots scope should be about limiting the fact an RJ can taxi in front of you rather than limiting the rj. I don't think I could be a rep and deal with people complaining about that out of all things.

And I'd love to have the seniority not to care that the 732s that we got rid of and the DC9s that we'll eventually park will be replaced by a whole bunch of large RJs and a sprinkle of MD90s. But I don't have that seniority and neither does a good portion of this airline.

I think I speak for a few people here who don't give a damn if E175 A pay is below 767 B nor do we care if we get to go from B to A in short order. What I care about is whether I'll have a job and right now, I don't think I will but someone flying a plane we should be flying will. To me its about sticking it to DALPA to get them to figure out how to handle it with DAL, not sticking it to DAL.