Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
We are not demanding anything. We want this issue looked at and studied before we go off and separate CPZ from our MEC. It would create another OH. We really do not want that do we?
How does it create another OH? Big assumption, with the only similarity that they were wholly owned, and CPZ was created at the direction of the NWA CBA.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
There is a benefit to giving them a vote on the MEC, and or stapling them.
Please explain that benefit. I don't see one unless seats or aircraft type are already scoped. Voting members that don't share my interests and flying that I don't own through scope make Delta pilot jobs more vulnerable, not less.
Originally Posted by
acl65pilot
They are already in seniority order, and more importantly we recapture some of the flying we gave up. We also could recapture the E-series type since it is not flown by another ALPA DCI carrier
One of the fundamental flaws in your argument. You recapture ZERO flying by stapling or merging with CPZ. All you capture is their seniority list. Your distinction between ALPA and Teamster E-Jet flying is the perfect example of that.
Your argument puts your conclusion before the study you claim to request.