Woaah,
Your panties are all in a bunch!!.
really now! watch your frigin tone and read what I said and not into it like you have.
Listen UP!!
It seems that your holier than thou expertise, is a little off base
You don't have to insult and belittle people. My piloting abilities do not warrant your demeaning attitude Id put you in your place, but .... then the mods will penalize me.
It is in the courts where this will be decided, not in the air.
it really has nothing to do with your vast experience and knowledge. or what really happened.
THE COURTS WILL RULE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
1.)Evidence, (FDR indicated the autopilot was on for most of the flight).
2.)Procedures (or, in this case, deviation from ) as stated in the Op Specs regarding autopilot its usage in KNOWN ICING CONDITIONS!! (Pireps were numerous regarding icing that night).
3.) The crew is not around to justify their actions, which makes it easier for the lawyers to blame them.
Not to mention the fact that there are and were KNOWN FREQUENT issues,with, warning lights going on ...which can be legally interpreted negatively, with regard to the
performance and operation of that deicing system, on that aircraft.
4.) So let me say, AGAIN, that at the end of the day, the autopilot usage with regard to flight into KNOWN ICING
CONDITIONS is what the plaintiffs will use to devour whomever comes within range of their legal pac man like chompping jaws.
I am in agreement with you that what might of caused the accident could very well be something not specifically related to Autopilot usage, or regarding the Op specs.
But lawyers will use this and anything else, for their advantage, when it comes to proving culpability.
they also feed on whomever has the least money to fight them back.... so lets see......
Hmm,..... Bombardier seems to have a pocket full of cash,
Pinnacle has more than Colgan....
that leaves Colgan at the bottom of the cash totem pole!! Tag, you're it!!
ABC News