View Single Post
Old 03-21-2009 | 09:48 AM
  #3  
zach141's Avatar
zach141
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: holding pattern
Default

Originally Posted by PearlPilot
"Some authorities prefer to hold the brakes until maximum obtainable engine r.p.m...however, it has not been established that this procedure will result in a shorter takeoff run...take off power should be applied smoothly and continuously-without hesitation..." (5-9).
I see this being correct, because if you stop, you are "giving back" a couple of knots that you had from taxiing onto the runway. That is, the static takeoff must overcome the total inertia of being at a standstill. Given that prop power is more or less instantaneous when applied, those few knots and already being in motion could be worth as much or more than starting the t/o roll from a stopped position with t/o power already applied. (Obviously N/A for a jet, where idle to TRT takes several seconds.)

I believe I'd instruct whatever the AFM/POH says, since I can't mathematically prove either one, and the Practical Test Standards say the applicant "applies brakes (if appropriate)", which could only mean "appropriate to that aircraft."
Zach
Reply