Originally Posted by
johnso29
I'm pretty sure he's not against the FFDO program. He is against some average joe being able to legally own a automatic machine gun, or a 50 cal rifle. There is just no need for that.
I agree. The problem as I see it is that the "right to bear arms" folks have 60 or 70 guns in their "collection" for protection. When some goofball kid gets ahold of them, nothing good ever seems to come of it. Protection is one thing, but how many guns do you REALLY need to protect yourself, and better yet, does it really need to be an uzi?
