View Single Post
Old 04-03-2009 | 07:33 AM
  #41  
WIPilot's Avatar
WIPilot
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 648
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by DeltaPaySoon
I agree.. I was in RGS recently and I didn't take anything away from it other than there wasn't anything new happening.

It was reiterated to us that SLC was NOT a testing run, temporary step. Mesaba was, in fact, to have more in SLC because they did NOT want JFK, or the performance numbers that go with it, under any circumstance. Skywest said they wanted JFK and we ended up with 5 planes instead of 10 in SLC (the remaining 5 in ATL) because of the current contract with Skywest / ASA.

Nothing more, nothing less.

That implies that mesaba has a say in all of this...which I think is doubtful.
Reply