Originally Posted by
skypine27
I'd like to believe management about the "we have no intention of furloughing"; They certainly have said it enough times.
However, these latest 2 excess bids seem (to me) to finally put the company in a position to furlough, if necessary. Previously, a furlough of say, 300 guys, would have resulted in dudes in almost every seat being hit: HKG FOs, ANC FOs, A300 MEM FOs, 727 FOS, 727 SOs.
By the time these excesses have closed, a furlough of 300 guys would only come from two seats: HKG FO and 727 SO. The 727 SO seat will be comfortably fat after the latest excess. And frankly, I don't believe the additional vacancies of HKG FO are a result of a gigantic increase in flying over there. Rather, I think it's the company's hope to get a few more senior guys in that seat to help offset any they'd lose in a furlough.
Hope I'm wrong and the "we have no intention to furlough" stuff sticks.
Why then wouldn't the company lop off the bottom 300 guys and then rebid the whole airline? Is this feasible or is it even permissible per the contract,,curious, not advocating it.