Originally Posted by
Bond
You know; you lost your credibility about 3 pages ago when you couldn't answer a simple yes or no question.
We know you will fly the 190's for a "fair" wage, but will you fly them for sub-standard wages? Cause you know, "fair" is open to interpretation, sub-standard is not.
So here's your chance again,
Will you blindly follow your ceo and fly the 190 for *sub-standard wages?
Or will you get behind the rest of your pilot group, and the industry, and push for leading industry wages?
*In case I need to define sub-standard for you, just as I had to explain date of sign on contract negotiations; sub-standard means below the current standard, for example less money than Jetblue by way of comparison across the board.
I've answered it as cut and dry as possible... twice. I will vote no for anything that is sub-standard. Read man. I've gone into vast elaboration how I would vote against anything of the sort multiple times with you. No, nadda, Aye, Ie, Na La, Ankobi, Geen, Nee, Haw, Tsaa C'am, Win, Ba, Aqa, Janiwa, Yox, Enna, Ayi,Ah ah, Gila, Ne, Poi-e, Hm, Awije, All-,Gala, Be, Ma'anic, Xa'ni, Hani, Ma, La, Ko, Nani, Kamu, Kepu, Su, Ne, Wata, yaga, A'ou, hani, aliu, umaaw, noon, yagu, Nese, nah, Gdu, Aa,.... or in the most simplest form I can think of... NO I will not support it by any means which I've stated a few times. Read what someone writes before responding to it already. Each time you've asked with this specific question I've answered with a very specific and easy to understand "NO". For crying out loud man NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO. I'll check back in tomorrow for your next "You still haven't answered my question yet" post.