Originally Posted by
sqwkvfr
Like I said, you're incorrect. The Minnesota State Patrol carries PBTs that provide admissible results.
I find it hard to believe that SCOTUS has ruled every make and model of PBT as inadmissible, nor would they make a blanket rule precluding future technology from being used in enforcement of DUI laws.
Now, I've been wrong before, if you can cite the case, I'll admit being wrong.
I'm sure you have a profession, whether it is flying, I don't know. I would not get on a forum and lecture you on how to do something you do for a living.
This specific topic is my profession, I have hundreds of hours of learning in it and performing it.
You obviously don't understand how a DUI arrest happens. But, instead of listening to my advice and explanation you simply have watched "Cops" too many times and think you know everything. It's OK, that is 70% of this country, caused by things like CSI and what not; I don't know how many simple theft runs I have been on for a simple report, and the complaint ant has demanded that I "dust for prints" or "check for DNA". Unfortunately TV and movies have convinced everyone that today's law enforcement has that capabilities, unfortunately its not like that.
I encourage you to go do a ride along with your local police department, learn about what you are so quick to give incorrect information on, and come back and report.