Originally Posted by
N2264J
I noticed that Christopher Monckton is a long time political and business consultant - not a scientist, peer reviewed or otherwise.
Thanks for the good faith input but I will continue to believe in the rigor of peer reviewed science.
Where are the reservations when Gore, Waxman, or some of the other true belivers speak? They are not scientists, peer reviewed or otherwise.
Your point is acknowledged, Monckton is not a scientist but he's clearly done his homework. I pay attention to this stuff--I think he's right on the money. Monckton's professional status aside, what about the
content of his presentation? What do you think about the material itself? True? False? Don't know? Settled science? I'd be very interested to hear what you think about that?
I'd also be very interested (and I'm not being sarcastic) to read any peer reviewed literature you could provide that showed any of Monckton's points to be off base.
WW