Originally Posted by
johnnysnow
TPROP.
Did your second comment not just commit the same offense as you claim he committed in your first comment? I'm not defending his comments but is it not hypocritical to point out someone's judging of individuals based on experiences, and then in the same post do the same in return? You would have held more credibility if you had defended the merits of training rather than tearing him down because you assume he has not flown 121. I'm just saying.
You may be partially correct, I probably should have left that part out. I only added it because according to his own profile hes only flown the 172 and Cirrus, when I saw that the monkey comment just got under my skin..
However your right my comments do make more sense without arguing his experiance, it is his comment I have a problem with not his experiance level. I have corrected it back to the way it was before I added that last little bit